Zoning Validity Challenges

White v. Township of Upper St. Clair (2009)

Waiver and laches do not serve as a defense to a citizen’s action challenging a zoning amendment to permit a communications tower on public property where the municipality failed to provide sufficient information to put citizens on notice of the project.

White v. Township of Upper St. Clair, No. 886 C.D. 2008, 2009 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 78 (Pa. Commw. March 3, 2009).

Date of Decision: 3/3/09

View Case Details »

Keinath v. Township of Edgmont (2009)

An ordinance restricting development in an R-1 District to one unit per two acres was not invalid or subject to curative amendment where the restriction was reasonably related to the Township’s interest in protecting the public health, safety and welfare and the Ordinance did not completely exclude a legitimate use.

Keinath v. Township of Edgmont, 964 A.2d 458 (Pa. Commw. 2009).

Date of Decision: 1/22/09

View Case Details »

Appeal of: Rural Route Neighbors (2008)

Evidence that the Township solicitor followed customary office procedures for mailing letters was sufficient evidence that the township complied with the requirements of the MPC for forwarding amendments to ordinances within 30 days of enactment even though there was no evidence of actual receipt by the planning department.

Appeal of: Rural Route Neighbors, 960 A.2d 856 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008).

Date of Decision: 10/22/08

View Case Details »