CACO Three, Inc. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Huntington Twp., (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004), 845 A.2d 991
Subdivision and Land Development
Appellant to subdivision or land development plan approval need not have attended or participated in any of the municipal meetings at which the plan was considered in order to establish standing.
Miravich v. Twp. of Exeter, 6 A.3d 1076 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010).
Rejection of Subdivision or Land Development Plans Must Specify Defects: Failure results in deemed approval.
Coretsky v. Butler Township, 520 Pa 573, 555 A2d 72 (1989)
A land development application shall be reviewed under the terms of the zoning ordinance in effect on the date the application is duly filed and shall not be afforded the benefit of any favorable zoning amendments enacted after the date of filing.
Telvil Construction Corp. v. East Pikeland Zoning Hearing Board,
896 A.2d 651 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006), reargument denied (Pa. Cmwlth. May 15, 2006).
Folino v. Greenwich Twp.
862 A.2d 176 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004)
Township demonstrated impermissible bad faith in plan review process by ignoring the developer's attempts to receive feedback on plan issues and by not agreeing to accept the time extension offered by the developer.
Highway Materials, Inc. v. Bd. of Supervisors of Whitemarsh Twp., 974 A.2d 539 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
Blue Mountain Preservation Assn. v. Twp. of Eldred,
867 A.2d 692 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005)
Residents Against Matrix v. Lower Makefield Twp.
845 A.2d 908 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004)
Submitting property to the planned community form of ownership may require subdivision plan approval prior to conveyance of units.
Frank N. Shaffer Family Ltd. P’ship v. Zoning Hearing Bd., 964 A.2d 23 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008).
A division-in-fact of property does not in itself constitute Subdivision approval under the MPC.
Guido v. Sandy Township,
880 A.2d 1220 (Pa. 2005)