Allowing patrons to engage in sexual activity was not an accessory use to the operation of a restaurant.
MAJ Entertainment, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia, 947 A.2d 841 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008).
Halfway house not an accessory use to offices for the Board of Probation and Parole.
Phila. Suburban Dev. Corp. v. Scranton Zoning Hearing Bd., 41 A.3d 630 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012).
Albert v. ZHB of North Abington Twp.
854 A.2d 401, (Pa. 2004).
Smoker constituted a sign under the zoning ordinance definition.
Gulan v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of E. Berlin Borough, 23 A.3d 629 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011).
Earl Township v. Reading Broadcasting, Inc., 770 A 2d 794 (Pa. Commw. March 29, 2001).
Private wind turbine may be considered accessory use to residential use.
Tink-Wig Mt. Lake Forest Prop. Owners Ass’n v. Lackawaxen Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd., 986 A.2d 935 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
The right of a zoning hearing board to impose conditions on the grant of special exceptions and variances for the operation of a public school recreation facility used for non-school purposes.
Hazelton Area School District v. Zoning Hearing Board of Hazle Township, 720 A.2d 220
Industry standards indicative, but not necessarily controlling, for determining whether zoning ordinance is exclusionary.
Twp. of Exeter v. Zoning Hearing Bd., 962 A.2d 653 (Pa. 2009).
COMMUNICATIONS TOWER: NOT A 'SEMI-PUBLIC' USE
McMahon v. Kingston Township Board of Supervisors, 771 A. 2d 96 (Pa. Commw. April 5, 2001).
Under the relevant zoning ordinance, a venue for events was not an accessory use for a large mansion in which Applicants resided in only a small portion.
Barnabei v. Chadds Ford Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd., 118 A.3d 17 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2015).