Allowing patrons to engage in sexual activity was not an accessory use to the operation of a restaurant.
MAJ Entertainment, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia, 947 A.2d 841 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008).
Ordinance was not de facto exclusionary to billboards where it permitted billboards to be no more than 25 feet tall and 50 square feet in area.
Interstate Outdoor Adver., L.P. v. Zoning Hearing Bd., 39 A.3d 1019 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012).
A private grass landing strip is not a subordinate and incidental accessory use to a single-family residential use.
Risker v. Smith Twp. Zoning Hearing Board,
886 A.2d 727 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005), app. denied.
Halfway house not an accessory use to offices for the Board of Probation and Parole.
Phila. Suburban Dev. Corp. v. Scranton Zoning Hearing Bd., 41 A.3d 630 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012).
Albert v. ZHB of North Abington Twp.
854 A.2d 401, (Pa. 2004).
Smoker constituted a sign under the zoning ordinance definition.
Gulan v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of E. Berlin Borough, 23 A.3d 629 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011).
Earl Township v. Reading Broadcasting, Inc., 770 A 2d 794 (Pa. Commw. March 29, 2001).
Private wind turbine may be considered accessory use to residential use.
Tink-Wig Mt. Lake Forest Prop. Owners Ass’n v. Lackawaxen Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd., 986 A.2d 935 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
The right of a zoning hearing board to impose conditions on the grant of special exceptions and variances for the operation of a public school recreation facility used for non-school purposes.
Hazelton Area School District v. Zoning Hearing Board of Hazle Township, 720 A.2d 220
Industry standards indicative, but not necessarily controlling, for determining whether zoning ordinance is exclusionary.
Twp. of Exeter v. Zoning Hearing Bd., 962 A.2d 653 (Pa. 2009).