If at least one ground for denial is based on clear noncompliance with the ordinance, and that noncompliance is an objective, legitimate, and substantive planning issue, appeals of plan denials and preliminary subdivision and land development plans will be denied.
Delchester Developers, L.P. v. London Grove Twp. Bd. Supervisors, 161 A.3d 1106 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016)
Zoning decisions are not final until a written decision is issued. Therefore, the 30-day appeal limitation period does not run until a written decision is issued.
First Ave. Partners v. City of Pittsburgh Planning Comm’n, 151 A.3d 715 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016)
Appeals from land use decisions must be brought within 30 days of the adverse decision, unless the claim asserts an unconstitutional deprivation of due process.
Monger v. Upper Leacock Twp., 132 A.3d 585 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016)
When a municipality resolves a land use appeal by Court-approved settlement agreement, prior to newly elected Supervisors taking office, the new Board is bound by the settlement agreement unless there were prior objections by a party to the land use appeal and/or there is a showing of extraordinary circumstances.
T.H. Properties, L.P. v. Upper Salford Township Board of Supervisors, No. 69 C.D. 2008, 2009 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 178 (Pa. Commw. February 11, 2009).
Res judicata barred issues previously litigated by the same property owner for the same property
Callowhill Ctr. Assocs., LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 2 A.3d 802 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010).
When a conflict of interest exists at municipal level, trial court should order the municipal agency conducting the hearing to continue after resolving the conflict rather than supplant the municipal agency with a hearing officer.
HYK Constr. Co. v. Smithfield Twp., 8 A.3d 1009 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010).
The payment of a filing fee is a requirement for the perfection of land use appeal.
Southern Chester County Concerned Citizens Organization v. Lower Oxford Twp. Zoning Board, (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007).
Berryman v. Wyoming Borough Zoning Hearing Board,
884 A.2d 386 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005)
Hartner v. ZHB of Upper St. Clair Township and Township of Upper St. Clair, (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002), 840 A.2d 1068 (2002)