Bradley v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of the Borough of New Milford, 63 A.3d 488 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2013).

Transfer of objector's property during pending appeal resulted in objector's loss of standing and dismissal of appeal.
Case Details:

Objector did not live in the borough, but was the owner of property located adjacent to another property that had received a use variance over his objections. Objector appealed to the trial court, but while the appeal was pending, he transferred title to the property to a corporation to which he was the sole shareholder and president. The corporation did not intervene in the appeal and Objector did not move to amend the appeal to include the corporation. Upon the expiration of the 30-day intervention period, the Zoning Hearing Board filed a motion to dismiss the appeal since Objector was no longer a “person aggrieved” based on his transfer of the property to the corporation.

The Commonwealth Court affirmed the trial court’s decision that the dismissal was proper because the corporation, not Objector, now owned the property. Individuals utilize corporations to avoid liabilities of the business; however, that also means that the shareholders do not own the corporation’s assets. As a result, Objector no longer owned the property and, thus, could not be a person aggrieved to maintain standing.

No liability is assumed with respect to the use of information contained in this website. Laws may be amended or court rulings made that could affect a particular procedure, issue, or interpretation. The Department of Community & Economic Development assumes no responsibility for errors and omissions nor any liability for damages resulting from the use of information contained herin. Please contact your local solicitor for legal advice.