Citation:

J. Trojnacki v. Board of Supervisor Solebury Twp, (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003), 842 A.2d 503

Case Details:

The Commonwealth Court held that the offsite tree replacement provision of the Solebury Township Tree Replacement Ordinance (STTRO) was invalid under the MPC. The provision in STTRO that was challenged stated “where development takes place in fully wooded lots, the Township may designate off-site areas where replacement trees shall be planted.” The Court explained that under Article V-A, “public capital improvements” stated within the definition of “offsite improvements” is not defined, however, the plain meaning of the term would include planting trees “in order to maintain the arboreal status quo of a township.” Section 503-A allows municipalities to condition subdivision approval on onsiteimprovements, or even fees in lieu thereof, but the statute disallows such practices with regard to offsite improvements.

Disclaimer
No liability is assumed with respect to the use of information contained in this website. Laws may be amended or court rulings made that could affect a particular procedure, issue, or interpretation. The Department of Community & Economic Development assumes no responsibility for errors and omissions nor any liability for damages resulting from the use of information contained herin. Please contact your local solicitor for legal advice.