|

ZONING AND SUBDIVISION/LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE APPLICABILITY
TO COMMONWEALTH AGENCIES.
Kee v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 722 A.2d 1123 (1998)
The Commonwealth Court has determined that the Pennsylvania Turnpike
Commission is subject to a township's zoning and subdivision ordinances.
In 1996 the Turnpike Commission expanded a rest stop/travel plaza without
obtaining township zoning and land development approvals. The rest stop
was initially constructed in the 1950s and has been a lawful non-conforming
use since the township's adoption of zoning ordinances in 1968 as amended
in 1985 and 1993. Despite not having the township's approval to expand
the facility, the Commission began construction and nearby residents
sought a court order to stop construction.
The court ruled that the expansion is subject to the township's zoning
ordinance. Both the Turnpike Commission and the township were statutorily
created by the legislature from whom they received their powers. The
task of the court in resolving the conflict when a Commonwealth agency
seeks to utilize property that conflicts with the municipality's zoning
regulations is to determine through an examination of the enabling statutes,
which of the entities the legislature intended to have pre-eminent power.
The Court decided that the Commission's enabling legislation does
not expressly confer upon it the power to disregard local land use regulation,
regardless of the consequences, and that the legislature did not intend
for the Commission's authority to be pre-eminent over that of the township.
This issue has arisen in similar cases involving other Commonwealth
agencies. Local zoning authority has been upheld over the Department
of Public Welfare which proposed to construct a facility for medically
handicapped persons in a residential area in the City of Philadelphia.
In that case the court determined that enforcing the municipality's
land use plan would not frustrate the agency's statutory mental health
program because the program was not site sensitive and other nearby
locations were available.
DISCLAIMER:
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania
and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls.
The information contained herein, although produced by professionals,
is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials
herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services. If legal
advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of an attorney
or other professional should be sought. DCED makes no representations,
warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability
of the information provided herein.
Back to Top
|