|
SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN: WAIVER/MODIFICATION BY MUNICIPALITY.
Ruf v. Buckingham Twp., 765 A.2d 1166 (Pa. Commw. January 11, 2001).
Note: Distinguished by Soliday v. Haycock Twp, 785 A.2d 139
A municipality is permitted by the MPC to grant modification of the requirements in its subdivision and land development ordinance if literal enforcement will exact undue hardship because of peculiar conditions of the land. In this case the township denied the subdivision plan, rejecting among others, requested waivers concerning widening of the road along the property and reduction of storm water runoff.
The Commonwealth Court found that the waivers should have been granted due to the unique grade and contours of the land in question. The court found these conditions to be peculiar physical conditions that precluded the developer from reasonably implementing the requirements of the ordinance. The township engineer and public works director had approved the alternate improvements but the Township had refused the requested waivers. While the court does not usually substitute its judgment for that of the municipality in this case it found that the totality of the evidence gave no support for the rejection.
DISCLAIMER:
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls. The information contained herein, although produced by professionals, is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of an attorney or other professional should be sought. DCED makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information provided herein.
Back to Top |
