Appeal of Rezoning: Rezoning Distinguished from Validity Challenges
Baker v. Chartiers Township, 163 Pa Comwlth.574, 641 A2d 688 (1994)
Note: Appeal Denied
Cross Reference: MPC Section 909.1(b), also 609.1(a), 1002-A
Under MPC Section 909.1(b) the legislative body has exclusive jurisdiction to consider requests for rezoning. The governing body acts in its "legislative" role and such decisions are not subject to direct judicial review. The proper form of appeal is a validity challenge to the zoning hearing board. Once a decision is rendered by the zoning hearing board, an appeal can be filed within the Court of Common Pleas.
The curative amendment procedure prescribed under MPC 609.1(a) requires the governing body to act as a quasi-judicial body considering the legal merits of the challenge to the validity of the ordinance and accompanying curative amendment. Appeals from decisions under MPC 609.1 also go to the zoning hearing board under MPC 909.1 and 1002-A.
In this case Appellant improperly appealed a rezoning to the Court of Common Pleas. The Court of Common Pleas rejected jurisdiction. On appeal, the Commonwealth Court upheld the lower court dismissing the appeal. The court also refused to remand the appeal to the zoning hearing board. Because of the passage of time, the Appellant then had no further appeal rights.
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls. The information contained herein, although produced by professionals, is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of an attorney or other professional should be sought. DCED makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information provided herein.
Back to Top