|

Immunity from changes in zoning and planning laws after preliminary
plan approval. Unacceptable schedule for phased development not
grounds for denial of preliminary plan.
Meadows of Hanover v. Board of Supervisors of West Hanover
Township, 557 Pa. 478, 734 A 2d. 854 (1999)
Cross Reference MPC Section 508(4).
Section 508(4) of the MPC is a comprehensive statement of the
affect of changes in zoning and subdivision/land development ordinances
on plats which have received preliminary approval. In general
these protections are as follows:
508(4)(i): While a plan is being processed by the municipality
it may not be adversely affected by changes to zoning and other
planning ordinances. This protection begins with the filing of
a plan (which must be a "complete" plan as required
by the subject ordinance) and applies during the duration of the
approval process. Further, after approval of a preliminary plan,
the plan is entitled to final approval in accordance with the
terms of the preliminary plan approval, including conditions imposed
on the preliminary approval and technical requirements of the
ordinance applicable to final plans.
508(4)(ii): An approved plan, whether preliminary or final,
is protected against adverse ordinance changes for a period of
five (5) years. The developer has the right to complete any or
all of the project within that five (5) year period without fear
that an ordinance change could adversely affect his project. The
developer must, however, comply with any conditions placed on
the approval by the municipality (unless the developer has been
successful in appealing such conditions).
508(4)(iii): If the final plan has been preceded by a preliminary
plan, the five (5) year period runs from the date of the preliminary
approval. If not, the protection period runs from the date of
final approval.
508(4)(iv): Where the landowner has "substantially completed"
the required improvements within the five (5) year protection
period no changes in the municipality's ordinances enacted after
the filing of the preliminary plan can adversely affect an approved
plan as to zoning classification or density, lot, building, street
or utility location.
508(4)(v): Preliminary plans may provide for installation of
improvements beyond the five (5) year period . The developer must
provide a schedule for such a phased development, to be updated
annually. The schedule must include the installation of the improvements
as well as the schedule for final plan application for subsequent
phases. Once such schedule is approved by the municipality as
part of the preliminary plan, the developer is entitled to final
plan approval for all phases. The approved schedule may be modified
only with municipal approval. Such approval by the municipality
is purely discretionary.
508(4)vi: Each section of a phased residential development must
contain at least twenty-five (25%) of the total number of proposed
dwelling units, unless the municipality, in its sole discretion,
permits a smaller percentage. So long as a phased residential
development is meeting the approved schedule for completing mandated
improvements and gaining final approval of subsequent phases,
the five (5) year protection period is extended for an additional
three (3) years from the date of final plan approval for each
such phase.
508(4)vii: The failure to adhere to the schedule for final plan
approvals exposes all further development of the project to any
changes in zoning, subdivision or other governing ordinances adopted
by the municipality subsequent to the initial preliminary plan
submission date.
In this case the Commonwealth Court upheld the denial of a preliminary
plan which provided for 15 phases to be developed over a 13 year
period. The municipality did not accept the development schedule
which was clearly outside of the automatic provisions of MPC 508(4).
The Commonwealth Court rejected numerous reasons cited by the
municipality in support of its rejection of the preliminary plan,
but found that the proposed phasing, being unacceptable to the
municipality was grounds for denial of the plan.
The Supreme Court rejected the arguments advanced in the prior
Commonwealth Court decision and determined that an applicant for
a preliminary plan calling for a phased development exceeding
the limitations of MPC 508(4) is still entitled to preliminary
plan approval. The excessive time frame requested by the developer
may be rejected by the municipality. The protection against new
legislation is limited to the automatic five (5) years from the
date of preliminary plan approval but the plan itself must be
approved.
DISCLAIMER:
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania
and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls.
The information contained herein, although produced by professionals,
is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials
herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services.
If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service
of an attorney or other professional should be sought. DCED makes
no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy,
completeness or suitability of the information provided herein.
Back to Top
|