|
|
Hartner v. ZHB of Upper St. Clair Township and Township of Upper St. Clair, (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002), 840 A.2d 1068 (2002)
The Commonwealth Court agreed with the trial court’s reasoning that the Zoning Hearing Board of Upper St. Clair Township had committed an error of law because it did not present its evidence first during an appeal of an enforcement notice to the ZHB pursuant to Section 616.1(d) of the MPC. The court stated that a municipality cannot meet its burden in an enforcement proceeding merely by setting forth the relevant procedural history and establishing the content of the relevant zoning provisions without presenting any evidence that those provision were violated.
The court did not agree with the trial court’s remedy and stated that correct remedy was a remand for a new hearing.
DISCLAIMER:
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls. The information contained herein, although produced by professionals, is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of an attorney or other professional should be sought. DCED makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information provided herein.
Back to Top |
