The Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library
The Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library The Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library The Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library
Disclaimer
Proposed Legislation
State Statutes
Land Use Case Law - Court Rulings
Land Use Case Law - Court Rulings


Key Topic: Miscellaneous

A Township Lease of Public Land to Allow Construction of a Communication Tower Creates a Subdivision within the Meaning of the MPC.

White v. Township of Upper St. Clair, Pa. Cmwlth.,
799 A.2d 188 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002)

Cross Reference - MPC Section 107; Donated or Dedicated Property Act; PA Constitution, Article 1, Section 27.

In this case township residents brought suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to challenge the construction of a communications tower in a township park. The park was created by a deed dedicating the park to the township for the limited use of recreation, conservation and historic purposes. The township entered into a 100 year lease with a communications company for .428 acres of the 200 acre park. The lower court dismissed the residents' complaint finding that the residents lacked standing to enforce the terms of the deed of dedication. The court determined that the township had no duty to apply to the orphans' court for permission to use the property for a different public purpose, pursuant to the Donated or Dedicated Property Act. The lower court also found that the lease did not create a subdivision of the 200 acres.

The Commonwealth Court reversed the trial court decision in part and affirmed in part as follows:

STANDING

The Court held that residents' interests as taxpayers and residents of the township were substantial, direct and immediate to pursue the claim that the township failed to uphold the terms of the dedication of the Park. The residents; interests are protected by the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article I, Section 27 which provides that people have a right to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment.

DONATED OR DEDICATED PROPERTY ACT

The Court held that a private right of action exists under the Donated or Dedicated Property Act, 53 P.S. 3381, et seq. to enforce the restriction to use the donated lands for the purposes for which they were originally donated.

SUBDIVSION AND DEVELOPMENT

The Court held that a lease which conveys a use of a discrete parcel of land from the township to a third party is an action creating a subdivision within the meaning of Section 107 of the MPC and required the township to filed a subdivision and development plan pursuant to the municipality's ordinances.

 

DISCLAIMER:
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls. The information contained herein, although produced by professionals, is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of an attorney or other professional should be sought. DCED makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information provided herein.

Back

Back to Top



 
Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library Disclaimer Proposed Legislation State Statutes Land Use Case Law - Court Rulings