|

Preliminary Plan Approval, with Adverse Conditions, is a Final
Appealable Decision; Failure to Appeal Waives Right to Challenge
the Same Conditions Imposed on Final Plan.
In Re Appeal of Busik, 759 A.2d 417 (Commonwealth Court)
August 9, 2000
Cross reference- MPC Sections 107, 1002-A
This case is cited primarily for the ruling that if a governing
body imposes a condition on a subdivision application that the
applicant believes is illegal or unacceptable, the applicant has
a right and a duty to exercise its right to appeal within the
time prescribed by the statute. If the applicant accepts preliminary
plan condition, without appealing the issue, the applicant waives
the right to any future challenges to that condition.
MPC Section 1002-A provides a thirty day period to appeal all
land use decisions. MPC Section 1007(b) defines a "decision"
as a final adjudication of any board or other body with jurisdiction
under any land use ordinance or the MPC.
In this case, the landowners accepted a condition imposed by
the township on the approval of their preliminary subdivision
plan. The landowners were required to obtain an agreement with
their adjacent landowners regarding the use of a road which traversed
both owners' lands. No appeal was taken from the conditional approval.
Instead, the landowners attempted to meet the condition but failed
to obtain cooperation from the adjacent landowners. The applicants
sought final approval of the plan absent the condition. The township
approved the plan but imposed the same condition to obtain a joint
use agreement.
The applicants appealed to the trial court which directed that
the plan be "deemed approved" without the condition.
The trial court determined that the Board's approval of a plan
imposing a condition which the landowners had ultimately found
unacceptable, was really a rejection of the plan. Failure to support
the rejection with specific references to the plan's defects constituted
an approval. The trial also found that an adverse preliminary
plan approval was not an appealable decision.
On appeal, the Commonwealth Court reversed the trial court and
found that preliminary plan approval with conditions may constitute
a final decision which must be appealed within the time prescribed
by statute. The landowner who accepts the condition imposed on
the preliminary plan and does not timely appeal the decision,
waives a future challenge to the condition whether or not the
condition proves ultimately unacceptable.
DISCLAIMER:
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania
and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls.
The information contained herein, although produced by professionals,
is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials
herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services. If legal
advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of an attorney
or other professional should be sought. DCED makes no representations,
warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability
of the information provided herein.
Back to Top
|