|
In re: Application of Brandywine Realty Trust to the Newtown Twp. ZHB
857 A.2d 714 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004)
In this case, the ZHB granted a variance and a special exception to the applicant to build a bridge in a floodplain. The ZHB accepted the application because it stated that the ordinance was ambiguous. The adjacent landowners appealed the decision and the court ruled that the board's ruling was a "manifest abuse of discretion" because it did not "require an expert in statutory construction to read the clear intent" of the ordinance.
The applicant wanted to build a bridge in a floodplain. The township had an ordinance that permitted building a bridge by special exception in floodplains. However, there was another ordinance that stated if a project in a floodplain would raise the level of a 100-year flood, the application would be denied. The applicant argued that these sections, when read together, created ambiguity because it would be impossible to complete the project without raising the water level. The applicant claimed that the ordinance permitted the project on one hand but prohibited it on the other hand.
The court dismissed this claim because the first ordinance, which allowed construction of a bridge in a floodplain, stated that the construction would be permissible so long as the actions "are not prohibited by any other ordinance." Because the project would have been prohibited by the second ordinance since it would raise the water level, both of the ordinances prohibited the project. This language left no ambiguity unless read though the "distorted prism" of the applicant's analysis.
DISCLAIMER:
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls. The information contained herein, although produced by professionals, is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of an attorney or other professional should be sought. DCED makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information provided herein.

Back to Top |