The Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library
The Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library The Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library The Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library
Disclaimer
Proposed Legislation
State Statutes
Land Use Case Law - Court Rulings
Land Use Case Law - Court Rulings


Key Topic: Variances

A variance is justified when the natural conditions of the land prevent reasonable development.

Solebury Township v. Solebury Township Zoning Hearing Board, 914 A.2d 972 (Pa. Cmwth. 2007). 

Landowners purchased a 3.23-acre lot in a Residential Zone that was also within the Steep Slope Conservation Overlay District and adjacent to a Historic District.  Due to the setback and buffer requirements applicable to the lot, the Landowners could not construct a residence without seeking a variance.  In the application for the variance, the Landowners testified that a driveway could not be constructed due to the property’s topography and that the proposed design of the house was comparable to other homes in the area.  Landowners further testified that they knew that a variance would be needed when they purchased the property, and that they risked overpaying for the property if the variances were not granted. 

The Zoning Hearing Board granted the variances because it found that the natural features of the property prevented the reasonable use of the property without the variances.  The Board also found that the Landowner’s hardship was not self-inflicted merely by purchasing the property knowing that a variance would be necessary to build their house.  The trial court affirmed and held that the hardship was not self-inflicted because it arose from the property’s natural conditions, not the purchase.  Also, the topography of the property made it impossible to develop without a variance.

On appeal, the Commonwealth Court affirmed and reiterated that “pre-purchase knowledge of zoning restrictions limiting development, without more, does not create a hardship;” rather, the right to relief runs with the land when the hardship arises from the topography of the property.  Here, the hardship resulted from the natural conditions of the land and the purchasers were entitled to a variance.

 

DISCLAIMER:
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls. The information contained herein, although produced by professionals, is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of an attorney or other professional should be sought. DCED makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information provided herein.

Back

Back to Top



 
Pennsylvania Land Use Law Library Disclaimer Proposed Legislation State Statutes Land Use Case Law - Court Rulings