|
A court of common pleas errs in a land use appeal when, without taking additional evidence, it makes its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.
In re: Appeal of Thompson,
896 A.2d 659 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2006)
Pursuant to a Home Rule township’s zoning ordinance, the developer of a forty-acre parcel submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow it to disturb portions of a riparian corridor conservation district to build roadways, utility crossings, and stormwater detention basins. Neighbors challenged the application before the township council. Council approved the application subject to 17 conditions. Neighbors appealed to the court of common pleas, which reversed, denying the permit. Developer appealed.
The Commonwealth Court reversed and reinstated council’s decision to approve the permit because the lower court made its own findings of fact and conclusions of law even though it took no additional evidence. Citing Local Agency Law Section 754, the Court explained that where a local agency, such as Council in this case, certifies a “complete and accurate record,” the trial court’s scope of review is limited to determining whether the agency’s conclusions were supported by substantial evidence. In addition, a trial court must give great deference to a local agency’s interpretation of its own regulations; only where the decision is clearly erroneous or an abuse of discretion, such as an interpretation that leads to an absurd result, may a trial court reverse. In this case, the record supported Council’s findings and the conditions it imposed.
DISCLAIMER:
This site is designed to provide summary review of selected Pennsylvania and Federal Court decisions related to land use and land use controls. The information contained herein, although produced by professionals, is not intended to render any legal service. Nor should the materials herein be utilized as a substitute for professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the service of an attorney or other professional should be sought. DCED makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information provided herein.
Back to Top |
